Editor's Choice
Platinum announces strategic review
Platinum said following the review Platinum Capital and Platinum Asia Investments may be wound up.
Sequoia chief's job at stake in upcoming EGM
Sequoia Financial Group will hold an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) in June that will consider a resolution to remove chief executive and managing director Garry Crole.
Scott Farquhar steps down from Atlassian
After more than two decades at the helm, Scott Farquhar will step down as co-chief executive of Atlassian.
Goldman Sachs ditches robo-adviser Marcus Invest
The investment bank is offloading Marcus Invest to Betterment just three years after announcing it will launch the digital adviser.
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
That is EXTREMELY poor form by the DSS - to make a ruling on a product, that is then launched and sold and then decide to reverse their decision in order to reduce their payments to those in Aged Care. A blatant and morally corrupt money grab at our most vulnerable. If the Government want to make changes to Social Security, they should propose them ahead of time (like the changes to AP income assessment from 1st January 2015), NOT look through previous rulings to reverse immediately without ruling to save some money and not even allow grandfathering for those who are already in product - entered into it in good faith.
"The Department of Social Services is working with Challenger to ensure that investors are appropriately informed by Centrelink about this reassessment prior to any changes taking effect."
That's like informing a person who is about to be run over by a car, that it hurts...!!
What good does that do for anyone, the driver, or the pedestrian?
Yep, nothing.
Various governments have changed their mind on how to assess various types of income streams probably 5-6 times over the last 10 years. Absolutely disgraceful. Basically no-one can plan their retirement properly because the govt backflips every 2-3 years.